The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Dahlberg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see how the article passes WP:GNG. Dahlberg's channels combined totals around 13 million subscribers. But, he is hardly notable as anything else other than a YouTube celebrity. Wikipedia does not grant automatic articles for every single YouTube celebrity with many subscribers, or someone who is somewhat of a figure to a single game, not to mention the number of subscribers a YouTube channel has absolutely nothing to do with anything either. When searched up to find detailed coverage in reliable, independent sources, the best things I can find are things about his recent anime voice role casting and collaboration for a anti-smoking campaign done two years ago, but nothing else related directly about him as a subject. The article contains info about Dahlberg's YouTube content and multiple Minecraft series that follow WP:OR. "Hey there! How's it goin'?" 07:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 17:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 17:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looking through WP:VG/RS's custom Google search engine, the only mention of Dahlberg is about his involvement in the Machinima scandal. Not notable by himself. --Soetermans. T / C 12:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no signs of better satisfying the applicable entertainers notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.