The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ane Amour

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fashion label. Source in article is a 2 minute video from a minor news TV station superficially covering the business, and I couldn't find any other really reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 04:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NY1 is a local news channel in New York City, the most populous city in the USA, as such it is not a minor news TV station. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmcmanam (talk • contribs) 04:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ane Amour has partnered with the charity Surf Rider. I believable a notable fashion line would be one that does charitable work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:EE42:7400:553E:7A19:50E:CC47 (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 00:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 00:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 00:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No hits on Google News, which is not a good sign - not even tabloid type/PR coverage. The only significant hits I'm seeing for Iyala Anne are for a yoga instructor, the same person apparently. The designer's press page shows really very little coverage - she only started in 2016! So basically this is WP:TOOSOON at best, especially as there is so little coverage. Basically, this is someone who's only just started out as a fashion designer, who dabbled a bit in yoga, who has had a few mentions, but nothing really significant. We know that she exists, we know what she does, but it's far too soon to demonstrate that she is notable. Mabalu (talk) 23:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I got curious as to why someone who hadn't been active since 2010 suddenly popped up solely to create an article on a random NY fashion designer who'd only just started up, and did some basic Googling. Within a few minutes, it was made clear that the person associated with the user ID Dmcmanamon is a friend of Iyala Anne, and is promoting and plugging her - which is laudable, but Wikipedia is not for writing articles about your friends' new start-ups or latest ventures. If Ane Amour/Iyala Anne has lasted a few years and is receiving ongoing coverage on her in reliable sources, then she would be valid for an article, but at this point, it is too soon, and there does appear to be an element of conflict of interest. Mabalu (talk) 00:12, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I basically consider this A7 and G11 material, nothing coming close for convincing. SwisterTwister talk 21:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.