The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 15:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, per WP:CORP. Created by User:Angel Medflight who obviously has a conflict of interest in the matter. Contested prod. Arsenikk(talk) 10:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless sources can be provided that meet WP:RS, demonstrate notability and verify the facts stated in the article. Wiw8 (talk) 11:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Company seems to be remarkably adept at getting its press releases plastered across the web, but there's nothing in the way of reliable third-party sources. Gr1st (talk) 11:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- the article provides no evidence of the scale of the cpmapny's operations, making it difficult to judge whether it is notable or NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added a reference. --Eastmain (talk) 17:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How does ruralnorthwest.com demonstrate notability? --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not asserted above other medical transport/retrieval services. JFW | T@lk 18:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. They clearly have a competent PR department because all a google search brings up are copies of press releases and directory entries. No independent, reliable sources on which to base an article. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.