Apantree Prayuttasenee

Apantree Prayuttasenee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP (created before 18 March 2010). Brianga (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete article has a total and complete lack of sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This is really old. The Thai search term for the article is อภันตรี ประยุทธเสนีย์ . Google search [1] found several match, including a clip [2] from Thai Film Archive. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 09:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Old magazines from 1969 with her photo on the cover: Magazine #1 Kwan Ruean [3], Magazine #2 Phadung Silp [4] --Lerdsuwa (talk) 10:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: article is no longer an unsourced BLP. Pinging Brianga and Johnpacklambert. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still support a delete under WP:BIO for lack of "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Brianga (talk) 18:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: National-level major pageant winner from the pre-google era. Adequate indicia of notability. Montanabw^(talk) 08:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment As best as I can tell the sources involve extremely passing mentions of her, nothing to suggest it is enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• If found to not be independently notable, redirect to Miss Thailand as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as there has been consensus that there's no automatic inheritance of an article for simply being a pageant member; none of this comes close at all for actually establishing independent notability or substance. SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The magazine covers provided by Lerdsuwa suggest in-depth coverage exists and would be possible to find in a good library. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Miss Thailand as suggested by Northamerica1000. I don't find her to be notable per Wikipedia's standards, but IMO redirection is almost always to be preferred to deletion if a valid target exists. --MelanieN (talk) 01:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Subject is not notable under more than one section. This is not even an acceptable stub article let alone a BLP stub. There is just not enough coverage. Placing in the top 15 in Miss Universe 1968 is not notable. One reference even states "But the ultimate success happens in the next six years later, when the name of "Apasra Hongsaku" was announced on stage at the Miss Universe held in Miami, Florida, USA", and she placed 15th? Otr500 (talk) 08:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Typically we keep articles that win their nationally-recognized pageant. Winning Miss Thailand in 1967 strongly suggests there are plenty of off-line sources to verify existence and notability to pass WP:GNG. I'm willing to assume good faith and keep it.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and advise you read the article first before you decide the article should be deleted because you never heard of the subject. --BCD 05:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)