- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Some passing mentions, but not significant coverage in independent reliable sources. RL0919 (talk) 06:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ashish-Pawan[edit]
- Ashish-Pawan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
First. Twinkle, why did you fail me? Second, the article has two issues. First, it comes across as an ad and I suspect there is WP:COI, but it is not so blatant as to qualify for speedy delete. Second, notability is insufficient. The sources that are sufficient for determining notability all discuss the shop itself, and the pair only in passing. -- NoCOBOL (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. -- NoCOBOL (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- delete The subject doesn't meet WP:GNG and some of the references used doesn't have any connection with the subject hence fails WP:GOODREFS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epaomo (talk • contribs) 08:08, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - clear WP:PROMO violation. Skirts89 (talk) 15:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Please Keep Added two links from huffingtom post and khaleej times. Even after have many news links from national.ae, gulfnews and others, why is it still not notable? (Besober (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]
- Hi USER:Besober. I see you're new to Wikipedia, so I thought I would take the time to give you a few pointers on notability guidelines. The references you added to the article are what Wikipedia considers to be non-significant coverage - in other words, while the tailors are mentioned in this articles they are only mentioned in passing, and the article is about tailoring rather than the mentioned tailors. To establish notability, what is needed is sources focusing on the tailors. -- NoCOBOL (talk) 07:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.