The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹ 12:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Audible Treats[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously listed for deletion here, closed due to lack of input. Originally listed by User:CorporateM for "Article pieced together with blogs, brief mentions, interviews and non-RS sources written by crowd-sourced "contributors". Article consists primarily of name-dropping. There is no indication this org is of historical significance." I agree - it's an advertisement. Citobun (talk) 05:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 06:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 06:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 06:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 06:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fairly obvious vote as the nominator of the first AfD, which was closed without any input from other editors. CorporateM (Talk) 07:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam ^Sing! 13:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I see the company mentioned basically as sponsors of events but not the coverage of the company that would justify an article. --Michig (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.