The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Audio Doughnuts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notoriety and references to reliable sources. Subpar level of quality. NBMATT (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete A local band that does not meet Wikipedia's music notability guidelines. NJ Wine (talk) 20:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - It isn't a band, it's a record label. -- Whpq (talk) 15:43, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 21:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 21:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability for this independent record label. -- Whpq (talk) 15:43, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 03:30, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Delete and pet peeve: Sub-par quality is NOT a criterion for deletion. If an article sucks, improve it. Having said that, this appears to be fluffery of a non-notable business. Roodog2k (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.