The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bader tv

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources, and Manta says that the company has 1-4 employees, and thus Wikipedia's corporate notability guidelines are not met. Also, the article is written by user:mikeleventhal who states that he is VP of the company, which is a conflict of interest.

DELETE Fails WP:CORP, COI violation, only purpose seems to be promotional/advertising--William Thweatt ^Talk | ^Contribs 18:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Googling suggests they don't exist. Wikipedia is not for WP:ADVERTISING. Msnicki (talk) 23:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The company can be verified (check out www.badertv.com) and can reasonably be expected to have more than 4 employees based on their worldwide offices. However, that alone doesn't meet all the requirements of WP:CORP Vertium (talk) 00:16, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: spam, mainly composed by one SPA, GNews: zero. -- Dewritech (talk) 09:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it needs a lot of refs and google doesn't help much in that. The facts in the article are in question and I can't find sources supporting them. It fails WP:GNG. →TSU ^tp* 09:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.