The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Uyghur detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bahtiyar Mahnut

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On a living (now released) prisoner from Guantanamo Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO. There are no secondary sources or independent coverage to claim notability of the subject. The citation used merely take the name. Moreover they are WP:PRIMARY source (WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) DBigXray 15:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. 17:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. 17:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 17:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & redirect, did not find multiple significant coverage of individual in any reliable source, however as a member of a notable group the article space can be replaced with a redirect to Uyghur detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Found this article from the Weekly Standard, however the article is primarily about a person by the name of "Abdul Haq" (who is not this person). However, it can be argued that this article from MSNBC could be considered significant; but does one article from MSNBC enough to establish notability, that is up to debate.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - subject is not notable as it lacks "significant coverage" in reliable sources per WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 05:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Uyghur detainees at Guantanamo Bay per WP:R#HARMFUL and WP:R#KEEP.--Joshuaism (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary coverage + WP:BLP = Delete. First Light (talk) 01:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.