The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Baird Reunion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Except for a Facebook page, and the sourced content included in the article (one sentence in each source), there is nothing published about this event. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a repsonse on the talk page of the article, which doesn't address notability. ^Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:18, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If a recurring site for the recurring event can be found, perhaps that site is already notable for some other reason. If so, that article can include material from the contested one, which would then redirect to the site article. Jim.henderson (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As with Flack-Council-Coleman Reunion, I can't find anything to suggest this belongs in Wikipedia, since we require anything included here to be covered elsewhere first. One of the articles is a family-provided notice in a local paper. The other discusses some members of the Baird family, but not the reunion. The talk page response is mostly about the issue of systemic bias very broadly, and doesn't help to address the issue of verifiability for the article, or lack of coverage of the specific topic in hand. Perhaps an article about black family reunions more broadly would be more sustainable. Mortee (talk) 00:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This doesn't pass WP:GNG and is wholly unencyclopedic. Natureium (talk) 23:33, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.