The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 22:00, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Banknotes of the Indonesian rupiah[edit]

Banknotes of the Indonesian rupiah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very excessive list of banknotes from one area, no references. All the images have been tagged as free use (and currently removed - as excessive free usage of images in one article).  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Indonesian currency will be covered in all major international banknote catalogues, and is clearly notable. There will also be plenty of Indonesian sources available. The length of article is an argument for splitting it into articles based on denomination or series, not for deleting it. I'm not sure why having a lot of "free use" images would be a bad thing. --Anthem of joy (talk) 20:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep. The subject, a national currency, is notable - and it has its own article at Indonesian rupiah. Note, though, that the main article is already tagged as ((Very long)) - which means that forking out subjects for their own articles is warranted. And so, here we are. If it's sourceable, then we need to keep the article. The image problems are a separate issue, one not related to whether or not the article should be deleted. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 20:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per above and article seems like it could be sourced with some effort. --That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 22:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep as the person removing the non-free content, I see no reason for deleting the article, a re-evaluation and introducing one or two non-free images along with a few sources and this will make a fairly good article. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 00:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Certainly better referencing is in order, but why would any of those reasons warrant deletion? The existence of this currency and its notes is trivially verifiable. Jpatokal (talk) 23:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Reincorporation into the main article will make it too long, if this article is deleted then nomination for all banknote articles is warrented. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 08:58, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Information about the denominations of national currencies is generally notable. References need improvement, but that is not a cause for deletion. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:26, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.