- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. Black Kite (talk) 22:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Barbie Itungo Kyagulanyi
[edit]- Barbie Itungo Kyagulanyi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Barbie Itungo Kyagulanyi
Ugandan author who does not satisfy general notability or author notability. This article was moved from article space to draft space once by User:MrsSnoozyTurtle, who cited BLP concerns and notability concerns, but was then moved back to article space by the author. Unilaterally draftifying it again would be move-warring.
An article should speak for itself, and it should not be necessary to check the references to verify notability. However, a check of the references shows that none of them are independent or secondary. (The reference check also found copyvio, which was tagged for redaction.)
| Number |
Reference |
Remarks |
Independent |
Significant |
Reliable |
Secondary
|
| 1 |
Caring Hearts Uganda |
Her organization |
No |
No |
|
No
|
| 2 |
Flash Uganda Media |
A puff piece |
No |
No |
|
|
| 3 |
The Independent Uganda |
An interview |
No |
|
|
No
|
| 4 |
Lifestyle Uganda |
A Q&A piece about the subject |
No |
No |
|
No
|
Naïve Google search shows the same information on social media as was found in the references, nothing we didn't know.
Recommend moving back to draft again, with instructions to use AFC. (I am not moving it back to draft unilaterally to avoid move-warring.) Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Draftify as per source analysis above. (giving this article another chance for improvement is quite generous, since the author had 5 months to improve it but instead chose to re-publish it without any attempt to address the issues) MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Draftify: I’m in agreement with the nomination and discussion above. If abandoned the G13 process will handle the case for deletion. 2pou (talk) 16:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.