The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to K. A. Applegate. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beach Blondes

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, as it fails the notability guideline for books. No real coverage outside of booksellers and online book clubs. Nolelover^Talk^/^Contribs 23:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to K. A. Applegate. I did find this review. Teh review itself is written by a high school student, but the review is published by a newspaper. It is not uncommon to have a teen write a review of a book targeted for that age group; the newspaper has still exercised editorial control in deciding to have the book reviewed. However, that is the only review I could find. That's not enough to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 12:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:33, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. I have found two reviews, but one is blog: [1], [2]. I don't think this is enought to say this book has been the subject of multiple reliable sources. Singularity42 (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.