The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Manski[edit]

Ben Manski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This deletion discussion has been started on the request of an unregistered editor at Talk:Ben Manski#Subject lacks notability. I will place my own comments below. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The subject does not pass either WP:PROF or WP:NPOL. As far as the general notability guideline goes I have found plenty of works written by him and interviews with him but have been unable to find enough about him. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politics, Social science, and Wisconsin. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Above comments are an accurate summary of that discussion. Reviewing the previous deletion discussion, it was observed that the subject was interviewed in 2004 by a local paper to represent the Green Party's take on presidential candidate John Kerry (Zaleski, Rob (2004). "Green Leader Has Doubts About Kerry".) That citation is insufficient for notability. There was also concern expressed in that prior debate about bad faith nominations against Green Party members. Reviewing the current discussion, the issues raised are unrelated to party affiliation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6230:1e30:8c2:e407:4908:9ffa (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for reasons stated above. Subject does not meet notability guidelines and the article is too heavily based on Manski's own work. It reads more like an annotated bibliography of Manski's published writings than an article about Manski himself. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. and the other commenters above. A case of WP:REFBOMB. The subject lacks the significant coverage in reliable secondary sources needed to pass the notability threshold. Sal2100 (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:PROF ,WP:GNG and WP:NPOL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.