The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Simon Ekpa. I will protect the redirect to stop disruption. Star Mississippi 22:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biafra Liberation Army[edit]

Biafra Liberation Army (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page in question may meet notability but I don't think it's ready for a stand alone page. Pointing WP: REDIRECT to Simon Ekpa. Otuọcha (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The two SPAs have just been blocked for sockpuppetry. Wikishovel (talk) 18:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can we just declare Simon Ekpa a Contentious topic? Please? WP:ARBHORN isn't quite close enough. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article has relatable RS which proves Biafra Liberation Army exists in real-life. See list of RS: Tracking terrorism, Guardian news, Yle News, New Telegraph, People's daily, Nigerian Pilot,Vanguard News, Arete Africa, Independent NG, Daily Post
It took me time to locate this sources and I assume good faith.
I have volunteered to modify, rewrite the article and make it more encyclopedic. I earnestly wish to see Key Administrators participate in this regard and I hope this will definitely help the situation at hand.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.