The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black sea studios[edit]

Black sea studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find video game sources: "Black sea studios" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

non-notable game studio with minimal independent secondary coverage. The Tecumseh Tribune source is rather trivial local coverage. — Scientizzle 17:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 17:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a company that fails notability criteria at WP:CORP. Note that a search on "Black Sea Studios" will return a lot of hits on the unrelated Crytek Black Sea, which was called "Black Sea Studios" from 2001-2008. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion read #2 there is no reason for this BAN. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WinB87 (talk • contribs) 6 May 2011

This issue has already been adequately explained on your talk page. Instead of inaccurately citing how two established users and an admin have violated policy, please provide a valid reason why this article does not meet the criteria for deletion found at Wikipedia:Deletion policy. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. All hits seem to be on Crytek's acquired Bulgarian studio. Cannot find enough secondary independent RS to support notability per GNG or CORP. Single Tribune mention is insufficient. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 19:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: If consensus is to delete, this page should be recreated as a redirect to the unrelated Crytek Black Sea as a plausible search term. The redirect page Black Sea Studios should also be retargeted to the same page (which it pointed to for nearly 3 years since it was moved). —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: no notability as per WP:CORPDEPTH. I agree with Kuyabribri about the redirects. Meph^talk 15:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete - company is just starting out, article can be reestablished if it becomes notable. The redirect should be restored as well. Seaphoto^Talk 00:27, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. They've manages to produce one game, "Gork", which also has received no coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 14:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.