The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blind faith (computer programming)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article that fails WP:GNG — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be a neologism that did not gain widespread use. Looking around for sources, I'm only finding mirrors of this wikipedia article. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. W Nowicki (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a jargon list. W Nowicki (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I've never heard the phrase in this context. A Google search comes up with nothing but this, a link with computer experts actually discussing this same article, and reaching the same conclusion. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6079392 Timtempleton (talk) 00:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.