The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:35, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boom-A-Rang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

look like its for marketing India1277 (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 07:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication that either restaurant is notable. Coverage is typical of unremarkable, non-notable restaurants. (I'm not sure where the idea of putting two non-notable subjects into one article came from. For the record: No, don't do that.) - SummerPhD^v2.0 13:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article lacks significant content and the subject is not notable. Bmbaker88 (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and should have been speedy deleted as the article is nonsense. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.