The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow close as delete + redirect. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Border policy of Donald Trump

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find a speedy category that applies here, and I'm tempted to just nix this via administrative fiat: it is the most POV piece of work I've seen on Wikipedia. There isn't a single sentence in it that is neutral. Drmies (talk) 03:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP policy, WP:POVFORK of Immigration policy of Donald Trump. Jack N. Stock (talk) 03:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a clear POVFORK. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- NorthBySouthBaranof, perhaps you can explain to User:Impartial Unbiased Triumph how this stuff is not neutral. I'm old and tired and they don't get it. And maybe you can comment on what "fact" means too... Drmies (talk) 03:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If there is any useful content (I don't see any, but maybe), it can be merged into Immigration policy of Donald Trump, which is where it should have gone in the first place. We need NPOV articles, not separate articles for each point of view. Brad v 03:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as promotional; this isn't the place for POV forks. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Immigration policy of Donald Trump. MB298 (talk) 04:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, a redirect would be smart because much of the talk is about "borders" so this title may be what people are looking for. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious WP:POVFORK is obvious. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly a WP:POVFORK and, as Drmies says, pure propaganda. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, obvious WP:POVFORK. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Immigration policy of Donald Trump. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 04:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obvious POV fork. Mathsci (talk) 04:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an obvious POV fork. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - POV fork — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flat Out (talk • contribs) 05:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Looks like a useful title to redirect from but the current content is, as others have said, a POV fork. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 06:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Plausible search term, but POV fork from that article. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Utterly redundant to the immigration policy page. Also, the very different (that is, laudatory) tone of this page makes me think it is a POVFORK as other people have said. If there is dispute as to how the immigration policy is to be described, the dispute needs to be settled to a consensus, not an additional page with one's preferred POV created. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.