The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment I'm not going to try to argue to keep this article because technically he does fail the current notability. However, this is a situation where I wish people would use some common sense. He has 2 of his 3 fights, I haven't seen anything about him being cut after his last loss, so there is a high probability that he will get that 3rd fight to obtain notability in the next few months. We can't force you to stop nominating guys like him, but some of us don't understand what the motive is for trying to delete so many articles, especially guys like this that will be almost certainly be notable in a few months. I can't force you to use some common sense, so I copied this article. If they decide to delete it, somebody please remind me that I have a copy of it saved so we can repost it when he gets that third fight. Willdawg111 (talk) 18:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.