The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No consensus among editors where to redirect to, so that could be discussed at Talk:Underdog (TV series). Cirt (talk) 04:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cad Lackey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary content. TTN (talk) 14:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- treelo _radda 14:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- treelo _radda 14:26, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Underdog (TV series) over a speedy delete seeing as it could easily be eligible for A3 but seems a likely search query. treelo _radda 14:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. One-line article about a topic not notable outside its fictional universe. VG ☎ 18:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect/Merge to the list of characters -- it's at List of Underdog characters not at Underdog -- he's there as "Cad", but a sentence would need to be merged in to explain who he is. If kept as a separate article, there would be more to say about him than just this--and in fact the main article, Underdog, does say a little more. DGG (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - no real world significance. Eusebeus (talk) 19:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's not one of the main characters. Nothing in the article to keep. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unlike Simon, no Gnews sources. No scholar sources. No book sources. Unlikely to see RS web sources. Fails WP:GNG. Protonk (talk) 02:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.