The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Careers in Optics Working Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable group, possible promotional elements to the original page. Shadowjams (talk) 11:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as spam and lacking significant coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unreferenced article about an initiative that lacks encyclopaedic notability. Even if the accolades listed in Careers_in_Optics_Working_Group#Achievements_and_Awards were referenced, they would fall short of WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.