The result was delete. The participants who favored keeping the article are apparently related and/or involved with meatpuppetry, with arguments that do not carry policy-based reasoning, such as proof of notability. Jamie☆S93 17:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | For the benefit of the closing administrator, a large number of participants in the keep section appear to be friends (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Uarrin). Thus I advise their reasoning be weighed with scrutiny in the close, and perhaps even consider the accounts listed as one entity, or discount them completely. Cheers, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
Unsourced BLP, no notability established, promotional in tone, etc. This person is an Italian and the Italian Wikipedia deleted the article about him, so why would we have one? DreamGuy (talk) 16:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]