The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cat Aficionado Association[edit]

Cat Aficionado Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never met WP:SIGCOV standards. There is only a single source "The Mythology of Cats" that even references it more than trivially. Elephanthunter (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Elephanthunter (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Elephanthunter (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree to delete it. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. 解培华 (2014-07-19). "世界名猫亮相哈尔滨集中选美(图)" (in Chinese). China News Service. Archived from the original on 2021-08-07. Retrieved 2021-08-07.
  2. 牛莹 (2005-01-24). "周末到王府井看名猫选美". Legal Evening News (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2021-08-07. Retrieved 2021-08-07 – via Sina Corporation.
  3. 曹囡囡 (2005-01-31). "北京：世界名猫与京城百姓共贺新春(组图)" (in Chinese). China National Radio. Archived from the original on 2021-08-07. Retrieved 2021-08-07 – via Sina Corporation.
  4. 汪震龙 (2005-01-30). "纯种猫抢眼新东安(图)". Beijing Youth Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2021-08-07. Retrieved 2021-08-07 – via Sina Corporation.
  5. "北京保护小动物协会爱猫分会宣布成立". Beijing Youth Daily (in Chinese). 2001-03-05. Archived from the original on 2021-08-07. Retrieved 2021-08-07 – via Sina Corporation.
  6. 陳家倫 (2014-12-06). "北京名貓展 身價破3萬". China Times (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2021-08-07. Retrieved 2021-08-07.
  7. Chen, Huiwen (2006). 貓典一籮筐 [Mao Dian Yi Luo Kuang] (in Chinese). Tianji: Baihua Literature and Art Publishing House [zh]. pp. 25–27. ISBN 7-5306-4362-2. Retrieved 2021-08-07 – via Internet Archive.
  8. Ling, Heng Yi (2013-03-19). "Cats are the top dogs for many pet owners". Shanghai Daily. Archived from the original on 2021-08-07. Retrieved 2021-08-07.

     The passing mention notes: "This is especially obvious at the recent 5th Shanghai Pet Fair in early March, where over 20 pure-breed cats were the highlight at the World Cat Pageant organized by the Cat Aficionado Association (CAA), China's largest cats registry."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Cat Aficionado Association (simplified Chinese: 北京市保护小动物协会爱猫分会; traditional Chinese: 北京市保護小動物協會愛貓分會) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 09:54, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cunard: Thank you for taking the time to find these sources. Although not a requirement, it would be nice if the article was updated to include some of these sources so for readers it would be verifiably notable, and it doesn't inadvertently get nominated for deletion again at some point in the future. The logo may be on the verge of deletion (see discussion) due to the inability to verify its origin. Does the CAA have a website or other materials that could be used to source an accurate logo? --Elephanthunter (talk) 19:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added the sources to the article. I cannot find a website for the Cat Aficionado Association and cannot find anything to verify that File:CAA international logo for distribution.jpg was created by the Cat Aficionado Association, so I agree with the current consensus that the image is unverified. Cunard (talk) 04:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - By the additional sources added. (WP:HEY) Suriname0 (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as per WP:HEY as the sources has been added by Cunard. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.