The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Catalyzer Startup Commune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only cited source is a press release. On Google and Google News searches, I can't find any independent sources that significantly cover the organization. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 06:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence of notability for the organization; a number of sources have been added to the article since the deletion nomination, but they only verify the existence or credentials of the people involved. The only sources that address the organization are a press release and the organization's website, neither of which confers notability. Similarly, all I'm able to turn up in a google search is more press releases and the occasional vanity page by the same person who created the article here (who also appears to be a participant in Catalyzer's business). A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sources do not establish notability. - MrOllie (talk) 02:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing found that would indicate suitability for an encyclopedia article. --Michig (talk) 10:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.