The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per lack of significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cds records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely non-notable independent record company. A google search is rather difficult because a search for "CDS Records" turns up too many hits for "CDs, records" Travelbird (talk) 04:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. Delete. Search on subject only reveals one site that is relevant to the record company. Assuming that results for "CDs" and "records" are omitted, search results may not prove notability. hmssolent\Let's convene 04:49, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The label may be independent but it is one of the top labels of the genre' known as Southern Soul or Soul Blues. They have released over 80 albums. Check Amazon. CDS Records have a national distributor, Select-O-Hits and I worked hard on this article. Hours even. You have allowed a page on Ecko Records, which are the other active label producing this kind of music http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecko_Records

Please reconsider as I'm not finished have lots of sources and references to add — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maleena2012 (talk • contribs) 05:14, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the required sources are news sources, not primary sources such as social media pages or anything that is connected to the company, news sources will establish notability and verification. Regarding Ecko Records, that article is also unsourced and I will see if any sources exist, if not, it will also be nominated for deletion. As editing is open to everyone, information may not be accurate or maliciously changed so adding references helps build verification. Although unsourced content is sometimes accurate, it's better to provide the sources while adding the content. SwisterTwister talk 19:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Google News and Books provided nothing relevant despite adding "soul blues" and "Carlsbad". SwisterTwister talk 19:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

all good points. Been editing the article little by little. Trust me in the Southern United States, Japan & Sweden this label is very well known. It's unfortunate it went by "CDS Records" because lots of search results of "cds, records, tapes, etc" appear. But in google if just type "cds records" the label's website is the first search result. I'm still working on getting this article up to wiki standards. It's a little mystifying because my computer capabilities are obvious not as hip as you editors LOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maleena2012 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.