The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of school shootings in the United States#2010s. Spartaz Humbug! 06:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Central Michigan University shooting[edit]

Central Michigan University shooting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable event without lasting impact. Veggies (talk) 13:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect. Breaking news stories like mass shootings or terrorist attacks always have an entry created, which is then debated for deletion if it turns out to be not notable, like this incident did. There are good arguments for creating an entry early on. I often look to Wikipedia for reasonably verifiable information about what has happened so far in an incident. Facts get verified as we go.EvidenceFairy (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, they shouldn't be created early on, especially since early reports are often wrong and/or full of speculation regarding basic facts. We aren't supposed to create articles based on what people want to read. ansh666 19:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you'll ever be able to stop people creating an entry when a critical incident occurs. I've observed this dozens of times and speculation gets immediately deleted by other users. The goal of Wikipedia is to be encyclopedic, so if you want to stop people covering current/recent events altogether, you'd have to set an arbitrary timeframe. I just don't think it would work. Since it's going to happen, I think it's a better use of time to improve the sourcing and quality of the entry than to try and shut it down, until a decent time period has passed.EvidenceFairy (talk) 04:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If no new important information comes to light and the information in this entry is not moved to another page, I would support deletion on the basis that it lacks enough notoriety to be a separate Wikipedia entry. At the start of the one-day incident there was a chance it could develop into a more significant event. Once the incident was over it became clear that it was a domestic violence incident that, while it tragically cost two lives, does not have more notoriety than what happens hundreds of times a year in the USA.EvidenceFairy (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.