The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Centre of Chinese Culture and Arts

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable group, I can't find any evidence of third-party sources to establish notability. The only relevant link I found to this group was a promotional LinkedIn profile. Additionally, the author of this article was an obvious COI and SPA. Considering that the company has ties with China and Hungary, it is possible that useful sources may be Chinese or Hungarian. Also considering that the article mentions that the group partnered with the United Kingdom, I found nothing useful when searching "Centre of Chinese Culture and Arts Hungary" through Google UK. SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Johnbod (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. Unforunately could not find relevant Hungarian sources, either. Some sources mention their charitable activities and events but nothing in depth about the organization itself. Scanned through 20 pages of Google search results in Hungarian. As a result of this, I also nominated the huwiki article for deletion. 小龙 (Timish) # ^{xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng} 17:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.