The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Champion Movies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely promotional article about non-notable company. Article creator, who I suspect of being WP:PAID, copied some of the more puffery-laden content directly from this press release (a primary source). I've removed and RevDel-ed the content.

The article creator described the company thusly: "Champion Movies has been considered to be an upcoming leading film company of Eastern India." Upcoming and leading? Anyway, that stuff has been deleted.

The only references in the article before I started meddling with it were Erosnow.com, Newsfolo.com, a blog I've never heard of in the context of Indian films, and this dailyhunt.in, which is just a reprint of this press release. (Dailyhunt.in is a content harvester. They just take other people's content and republish it.)

I can find no significant, independent coverage of this company from reliable sources. Searching for "Champion Movies" "Ritum Jain" (a key person according to the infobox) produces no results. Combining "Champion Movies" with "Bengali" produces no significant hits and "Champion Movies" "Jawker Dhan", what the article described as "a huge box office hit", produces no significant hits either.

Thus, subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NCORP and I think the article creator would be inclined to claim inherited notability for the films they produced, but we know that is not sufficient. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:01, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - No significant, independent coverage of this company in any third party reliable sources --Adamstraw99 (talk) 22:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • There was television show talking about the production of Champion Movies in an Indian channel. It is a fully new film company in eastern india, so it has no search results in google or other search enfines. But in that television show, during an interview of Ritum Jain and the company, the show distributors cleanly said about its good production quality though it has only two films released in Bengali theaters but has ready gained a great fame but not in internet. As there are only two productions so it is not so popular now in news and media now, but I think soon it will be.

I did not know daily hunt as a copy publisher of other website. So I made a reference of that.

If the article meets the criteria for deleting an article, then delete it. In future I will definitely try to create the article if more acceptable references came out.

AnkurWiki (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We don't create articles on a supposition that a topic will be notable one day, we create articles on subjects that are already notable. And, we don't use primary sources like interviews and promotional literature like press releases to establish notability. We need significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This is the most fundamental rule when creating articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:59, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:TOOSOON with only two productions as well as not passing WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 20:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC) 20:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.