The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:A7. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chandan saxena

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines WP:CREATIVE and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib (talk) 12:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I thought I saw this deleted. –Ammarpad (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why You Want it to be Deleted Saqib?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChandanSaxena (talk • contribs) 12:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i dont think this should be deleted from wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yashi Yadav (talk • contribs) 12:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.