The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Klamroth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Time for another AfD. Simply being the oldest person in an arbitrarily defined geographical area is not inherently notable, and the extremely stretched associations in this article show that there's absolutely nothing here. WP:NOPAGE The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:37, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:18, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This article fails WP:GNG, WP:NOPAGE, and WP:NOTINHERITED. The coverage is WP:ROUTINE and there is no actual article to be made about this woman, hence the many stretches, like tying her as an affinal relative of some guy involved in a famous WWII event. There is also no notability guideline or policy that "the oldest x" is notable either. Newshunter12 (talk) 01:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of German supercentenarians – The only coverage this person received was because of her reaching an advanced age. Her age is notable, not her life or deeds. Hence her placement among the list of oldest Germans ever is sufficient for recording notable facts in this encyclopedia. Please also note that the subject expressed being tired of the "fame" associated with her being the "oldest person in region X". Wikipedia should respect her wishes by avoiding to host an unnecessary article. — JFG ^talk 10:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and redirect if someone cares. Bad relist - let am Admin close these AfDs please when there is no opposition. Even the subject would not have wanted a page on her according to the article. Legacypac (talk) 07:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.