The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 01:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chateau Marsyas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Winery that does not meet WP:CORP, or more specifically, WP:WINERY. Sources are either directories/listings, coverage of winery-staged press conference, or trivial mention in a review. --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 20:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 11:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• prometheus224 - After searching internet, it seems that Chateau Marsyas benefit from an important coverage in international media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prometheus224 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]
• Speedy - I tagged it as A7 although it could possibly meet G11. Smithers (Talk) 02:12, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I declined the CSD as there was notability asserted in the article. Stephen! ^Coming... 17:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Seems to fail WP:WINERY, no real sourcing to indicate notability. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.