The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 06:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chelse Benham[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a person who lacks the significant coverage in multiple independent sources to meet notability. As a creative professional, WP:CREATIVE is not met either. There is a claim for winning three Emmy awards. However, these are regional awards. And of these, one of them does not pass verifiability. The claim for a SouthEast regional emmy in 1999 for "Celebrating Knoxville" is not referenced. However, I looked at [1] whichj lists the winners and nominees for 1999 for that regional emmy and there is no listing the show or Chelse Benham. The Lonestar Emmy awards for 2007 and 2009 are awards in the student production category. See [2] and [3]. Whpq (talk) 06:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam ^Sing! 10:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable student filmmaker and businessperson. No good-quality independent sources confirming any kind of notability. Fails GNG and WP:CREATIVE. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 16:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.