The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "Word of mouth advertisement" is not a reliable source. SilkTork *^YES! 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chiaffalo[edit]

Chiaffalo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I happened to run across this article, and the thing is, I can find no evidence that this art project ever came to fruition. Moreover, it doesn't seem notable enough for an article about an event that was planned but never actually took place. For a rationale, I guess I'll say that the project, at least as a fait accompli, is unverifiable in reliable sources. Deor (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Deor (talk) 18:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. From the utter lack of WP:RS on teh Interweb, I'd say this project was a Fail! Eddie.willers (talk) 01:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - for a complete lack of any coverage whatsoever. -- Whpq (talk) 18:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. —Deor (talk) 19:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• delete seems pointless...Modernist (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of above. ??? JNW (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.