The result was keep. Per improvements. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I tagged this article for speedy deletion under criterion G11 and although that speedy-deletion was declined, I stand by the statement - it "'does nothing but promote some entity" and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic - If that tagging was not correct, please let me know.
It was created by now-blocked China JOY2010 (talk · contribs) on 15 August.
The CSD tag was removed by Extransit (talk · contribs) rm csd, not spam, some good content here, will edit
I explained my rationale for the tag on their user talk page, asking for further input, but they have not, to date, responded there. User talk:Extransit#ChinaJoy
I proposed deletion on 23 August [1], and the PROD was removed by DGG (talk · contribs) please look for sources, & if not findable, use AfD. This was discussed, User_talk:DGG#ChinaJoy.
So the main issue here is that yes, perhaps this might be possible to write about the subject (ie notability is possible, because there is no current independent referenced content, it serves merely to advertize. There might be sources in other languages, but I am not able to rewrite it myself. Chzz ► 14:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]