The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. CSK#1 - Absence of delete rationale. Neither the nominator, nor anyone else, supports deletion. (non-admin closure) ~ A412 ^talk! 18:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese opening (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article introduces the Chinese flow of Go layout, from the origin to the development and improvement of the process of integration into AI, which I think is very necessary. Because Weiqi is one of China's traditional culture and has a long history, with the development of modern times, Weiqi techniques will also develop with the progress of science and technology, and be integrated with science and technology. Linziyu1823 (talk) 04:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Linziyu1823 (talk) 04:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The so-called Chinese opening pattern in go (game) is clearly notable, many books having been written about it. The basis of this nomination is unclear. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I am confused. The nominator does not give any reason why this article should be deleted. The nominator's comments seem to prove that this article should be kept, not deleted.--Neo-Jay (talk) 07:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural keep, this is a nomination by a brand-new editor who I suspect has no idea what AfD is for. I am not convinced they actually know that they were nominating an article to be deleted. Elemimele (talk) 09:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Cunard (talk) 09:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I procedurally closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Chinese opening, but note that User:JMWt wrote about this article: Keep (Chinese opening) - I don't understand the nom reasoning and whilst the current sourcing seems imperfect, there seems to be plenty of reason to think the topic is notable. Geschichte (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I see several pages about the Chinese opening in The World of Chinese Go, Dictionary of Basic Fuseki and Go! More Than a Game. Also, the nomination doesn't make any sense. Toughpigs (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.