The result was delete. I would have preferred for this nomination to have been made in good faith but even discounting the nominator completely we have 5 sound arguments to delete vs. 2 keeps based solely on the status of the nominator. The consensus to "delete" is clear. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The topic of this article fails the general notability guideline due to a lack of secondary coverage in high quality sources. Furthermore, the article offers only plot only coverage of the subject, and there is no obvious role for any other coverage to play within it. Anthem 20:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC) - Please discount any comments by Anthem of Joy, he's a sock puppet. Mathewignash (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But back on topic here, there might be something salvageable here even if one views this timeline's list of fictional events (the "timeline" section of the chronology) as indiscriminate and excessive plot (which, fair enough; gut that section). We have articles on all of the Star Wars films, dozens of books, comic books, video games... Which more or less fits into a larger fictional meta-narrative (compare Star Wars canon and Star Wars Expanded Universe); knowing that is integral to understanding the subject matter, particularly given that the second film trilogy is set before the first, and all of the non-film works take place before, after, or in between those films in very specific ways. If you look at List of Star Wars books or List of Star Wars comic books, both of those are already organized by the fictional "era" in which the works are set (see also Chronology of Star Wars#Film timeline; List of Star Wars video games is organized by game release date, however). So I wonder whether there is any possibility of combining all of that in this chronology without it being too cumbersome, so all works of a particular fictional time setting are not split by medium. That way, the lists by medium could also focus more on sortable columns for real world info. The list of books, for example, is woefully lacking publication dates. postdlf (talk) 03:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]