The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Codemotion[edit]

Codemotion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relatively minor tech conference--routine reports only DGG ( talk ) 14:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep There are an undue number of tech conferences compared to trade shows in other industries on Wikipedia, but 5000 attendees and coverage in Wired Magazine is probably enough to keep this one. The article does need copy-editing. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:28, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- WP:ADVOCACY with copy such as "Codemotion fully supports women engagement and is committed to holding a Conference that reflects the diversity of its community..." Industry conferences are rarely notable and the one attended by 5000 ppl falls in this group. This content can just as effectively be housed on the org's web site, where it belongs. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Lean to keep since it has some coverage other than its own web site? Can see both sides on this one. W Nowicki (talk) 17:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"some coverage" is anextremely minimalstandard. DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Written completely like promotional. Intentions are clearly to advertise the conference on Wikipedia. Non notable. Light2021 (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - At this time. However, if true and that they did create/started JavaDay, as stated in the piece, I could see revisiting. Sorry to say, I could not find any reliable sources to that affect. ShoesssS ^Talk
• Delete--I failed to find any WP:RS covering the subject non-trivially.@Graeme Bartlett:-- Any particular reasons w.r.t to your's accepting the article?Winged Blades ^Godric 10:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I didn't know that we cover conferences - though I suppose TED (conference) and Burning Man might fit. I trust k.e.coffman when he says "Industry conferences are rarely notable." There's likely a lot of routine coverage ("There will be a conference ....") but hard to find anything substantive. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 18:22, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.