The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Collins Osuagwu

[edit]
Collins Osuagwu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources. All the sources are from blogs or campaign websites. Appears to have been created from a sockpuppet account and worked on by other accounts. Meanderingbartender (talk) 02:29, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 05:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 05:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mendyli (talk) 01:08, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A person has to win the election to be considered notable as a politician, not simply be a candidate, and you haven't shown any evidence that the "Excellence in Leadership Award" is a notable award for the purposes of making a person notable because they won an award. That criterion does not attach to every award that exists, but only to a certain rarefied class of top-level awards which you haven't shown that the "Excellence in Leadership Award" is part of. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please see http://sunnewsonline.com/imo-gives-merit-awards-to-ekwueme-ghanaian-president/ The award is pass into law and is the highest recongnise award in the state and Nigeria. Like i earlier highlighted, the article needs an experience editor to help in reconstructing the references used by the creator of the article. The above reference wasn't even usedMickysandly (talk) 11:36, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that an award is "pass into law" does not automatically make it a notable award for the purposes of making a person notable because they won it — government awards can still fall below the notability bar, and non-government awards can surpass it. And that source isn't about Collins Osuagwu at all — it supports that the award exists, but is about it being presented to somebody else, so there's absolutely nothing in this article that this source can be used for. Bearcat (talk) 16:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
please see http://www.ihechiopara.com/2017/10/imo-decorate-former-vice-president-and.html?m=1

The above reference/source meet your request of his name mentioned and the award been giving to him.Mickysandly (talk) 11:27, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's a dead link of an individual person's website, not WP:RS media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Below is another links were it is been mentioned http://www.giftnaija.com/2018/03/chief-collins-osuagwu-is-among-2017-imo.html?m=1

http://www.citypeopleonline.com/meet-collins-oswuagwu-face-behind-zeus-marina-oil-gas/

https://gregnwadikeblog.com/2018/02/06/sdp-will-take-over-power-in-imo-in-2019-osuagwu/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickysandly (talk • contribs) 20:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs don't count as reliable or notability-supporting sources either. Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Him been a political candidate is not what is been considered here but the award he won. Mendyli (talk) 07:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The award he won is not notable enough to make him permanently includable just for having won it, if you have to depend on blogs and individual people's own self-published websites to support it. We need real reliable source media coverage about that distinction before it counts as a notability claim, and we need several pieces of that, not just one. Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.