The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy Corner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No acceptable references. Notability seems improbable. Maproom (talk) 08:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom BCD 09:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete per my PROD message, it's spam about a non-notable organisation. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt - fails WP:CLUB and WP:GNG. It's unreferenced, and the only mention of it I can find in WP:RS is on the university's website. WP:COI is also evident, and it's borderline spam. That can be fixed, but the notability issue would remain. I see that it was recreated immediately after the last deletion, by moving the lowercase redirect left behind, then filled right back in by an anonymous editor. Cute. Salt it, or it'll be back up in a week. Wikishovel (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No evidence of notability. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per WP:GNG, and the spin-off page Farce Side Comedy Hour probably should undergo afd as well for similar reasons. TiggerJay (talk) 02:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt Gosh. Feel a little bit guilty for initially questioning their notability which has lead to this, because I am an inclusionist by nature but in this case SALT as well. Otherwise it will be like a boomerang. Like to wish all the cast though, past, present and future -my very heart felt best. However, just should not be on WP.--Aspro (talk) 17:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt I agree with all of the above Kiltpin (talk) 21:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Spammy, longstanding COI issues from a single-purpose account. -- œ^™ 07:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--there's no there there. A few hits maybe in some local publications, but that's it. BTW, don't see why we should SALT this; Wikishovel, I think we pay more attention to these recreations now. Drmies (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.