The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 01:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Party of India (Marxist) campaign for the next Indian general election[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article and sources do not meet GNG and if they did the article would still need WP:TNT to fix and create a proper article. All of the material in the article is either improperly sourced or off topic and the text itself would require complete rewriting. // Timothy :: talk 01:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Every campaign will draw media attention, and it's unclear why this one is notable in that sense. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 05:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India. Shellwood (talk) 16:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If we started creating Articles for Campaigning then there would be thousands of articles in this type of subjects only. Dawkin Verbier is right. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 04:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNC Cinadon36 09:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : CPIM is a national party, so it's campaigning is worth notable. Campaigning of Indian Congress Page is also created by other editor with the information about formation of their committee. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XYZ 250706 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cinadon36@Dawkin Verbier@Misterrrrr CPIM is a national party, so it's campaigning is worth notable. It is not only in Kerala, I have added campaign in Bihar also. Campaigning of Indian Congress Page is also created by other editor with the information about formation of their committee. If campaigning of one national party like CPIM is deleted, then Indian National Congress campaign for the next Indian general election should also be deleted as neutral opinion. Otherwise both should be kept. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As a national party, CPIM has MLA representation in 8 states and considerable presence in West Bengal, Telangana, Himachal Pradesh. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cinadon36@Dawkin Verbier@Misterrrrr@TimothyBlue Do not think that the article has almost been completed. It is now just started. More information will be added when news will come. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @XYZ 250706, I am not sure what is the meaning of "worth notable" is. In any case, WP's rules do not pay attention to "worth noticing" but to "established notability" (or "expected notability" in same rare cases, ie a war, a coup etc). Also, WP NPOV is not about deleting articles of the same category. If a non-notable article has not been deleted, the argument for other not-notable articles not to be deleted is poor. (Oh! look, we have done a mistake in that article, so lets replicate that mistake). Anyway, you can nominate any article you wish for deletion. Cinadon36 06:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand Wikipedia:GNG and then argue. Anyone can nominate any article up for deletion, you can too. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 08:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cinadon36@Dawkin Verbier@Misterrrrr I think it meets WP:GNG as this article has no original research, has citations from reliable sources and will have more significant coverage till the eve of election (when more news will come, I have already added information of campaign in two states, as per available information it has significant coverage). I think the article should be improved more without deletion. Can it be taken to draft till eve of election? XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.