The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• This is one of the two main scientific conferences on computer algebra. I don't see, why this article should be deleted.109.171.137.240 (talk) 23:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I can see many books about the conference published by Springer so on the face of it the notability criteria are met.[1] However, meeting the criteria only leads to a presumption of notability and there may be reasons why this article should be deleted. If so, the reason should be given because it is not at all clear to me. I don't agree with some (or, even, any) of the tags currently on the article. Thincat (talk) 10:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I venture no opinion on the conference, but the Springer "books" you list are just the conference's own publications, so they are WP:Primary and in no way establish notability (each conference gets written up in one "book"). Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Surely the publisher is Springer and as such is independent (they publish these books to make a profit, not because they want to further the aims of the conferences). I expect the authorship is by the participants. Thincat (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.