The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 20:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Robert Murray[edit]

Conrad Robert Murray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not certain this is still ready for a separate article. Conrad Murray (the normal naming convention) was created and then fought over and finally redirected in 2010 and has remained protected since then. A move to this page seems like gamesmanship almost of the prior version but nevertheless, evaluated as a separate new article, I think this is still basically a WP:BLP1E situation that should just be deleted and if kept rather than a redirect to California v. Murray like the regular Conrad Murray page does, that page should be restored and the history merged or something. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 13:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (and move to Conrad Murray) - I'm seeing years of coverage in numerous reliable sources. It's true much of his notability is likely because of his relationship with Jackson, but it appears he's had plenty of coverage from beyond any single event. FuriouslySerene (talk) 17:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be kept as is or moved to Conrad Murray? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, it should be moved. Amending my vote. FuriouslySerene (talk) 13:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - per WP:GNG. simply.BabbaQ (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as convincing enough for his own article apart from Michael Jackson's own article. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - one condition of deleting under BLP1E is "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented." Indeed, Michael Jackson's death was highly significant, and Murray's role is both substantial and well-documented. GAB^Hello! 22:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.