The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:16, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Convention panel

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a specific term, a mere juxtaposition o two words: "convention" + "(discussion) panel". No evidence that such word combination attracted any scholarly attention. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 01:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a dictionary definition. -- Whpq (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/merge This is a common format which we cover in other places too such as panel game and brains trust. Warden (talk) 13:27, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:DICDEF. Two random words together does not a subject make. No identifiable subject, no possible sources. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 13:30, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a couple of sources: Panel Discussions, The Panel Discussion. The claim that there are "no possible sources" is thus refuted. Warden (talk) 15:44, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please care to notice that these refs are not for the article subject in question (as defined by the intro sentence). (e.g., does they mention "people sitting in chairs?" :-) The article is probably a well-meaning attempt by a pre-teen, but not salvageable. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Dic-def. Notable convention panels should be mentioned at articles on the conventions themselves, not at this article p b p 18:31, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.