The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Corduroy and Me! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD by another editor. Fails GNG, complete lack of sourcing in both article and BEFORE search. Could be a case of being too soon, so not adversed to draftification. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 13:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and United States of America. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 13:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Would've said that no harm on drafting for now (sources might pop up after release) or even redirecting to Corduroy (TV series) if Wikipedia:SIGCOV is still not met, but I can't find any sources to prove the existence of the subject. So unless someone finds a source or two, I'm leaning towards deleting. Delete if existance can't be proven. NotAGenious (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I think this is a hoax article. We have quite a few sockpuppets whose primary activity is creating articles on fictional children's TV series. With no sources provided, I'm skeptical that this one will be released later on in the month. So far, the AFD tag has been removed from this article close to a dozen times now so I have protected the article for a week. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for protection and this assessment Liz: I was unsure of whether the article was a hoax or not, so I was hesitant to tag for G3. Regardless, if no sources can be found then the article should be deleted anyway. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 09:46, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no sources found in the article. HarukaAmaranth ^春_香 15:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The notion that a show based on a children's book (Corduroy) would air in the US on TeenNick is a dead giveaway that this is a hoax that cannot possibly be found in legitimate sources. (As Liz already alluded to, there is a group of socks that keeps insisting that TeenNick is a venue for preschool programming, a notion that I'm sure would be news to channel owner Paramount Global. This is not the first time an article making similar claims has come to AfD. And no, the TeenNick schedule for October 21 does not include this program in any way, shape, or form.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom lacks indepth sources fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.