The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cornelius Lehane (novelist)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crime novelist who seems to fail WP:AUTHOR. Some book reviews but nothing substantial about the person to be found. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

comment 3 reviews - kirkus, publishers weekly, and critiqueslibres.com, meets Nauthor. Marthadandridge (talk) 17:40, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no. Pub. Weekly, Kirkus, are trade journals that review all books flagged by the publisher as significant. Our "3 review" standard for authors requires reviews in publication in other sorts of publications, these could be specialty magazines - it doesnot have to be the Times, but Kirkus doesn't cut the mustard.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This looked plausible, so I beat the bushes searching. But I can't source it beyond the brief promo for a book talk in a local bookstore that ran in the Washington City Paper and that looks like a book review on the page's reference list.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.