The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cross.tv (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability under WP:CORP. No good references - all primary, press releases or nonnotable. The article has never been any better than this since creation. Was killed at AFD once already in 2009. David Gerard (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not seeing any better sources than what's in the article either. shoy (reactions) 12:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and I frankly consider this A7 material. SwisterTwister talk 19:49, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- no indications of notability and unreliably sourced. My searches do not turn up anything better. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.