The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Research

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Book doesn't meet WP:NBOOKS. Reads like an advertisement, only primary sources. Long-tagged for notability and references. Mikeblas (talk) 15:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to be a special collection of papers. nothing inherently notable about it that I've been able to ascertain. Sailsbystars (talk) 01:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article originally contributed by an account which is blocked as a Sockpuppet. The title is rather general for searches, but I am finding nothing to indicate that it met the notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 06:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.