The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 00:36, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dadi Theater Circuit[edit]

Dadi Theater Circuit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This unreferenced article isn't a WP:HOAX; this [1] Hollywood Reporter article seems to confirm Dadi is China's third largest theater chain . However, being the third largest of anything usually isn't a cause for inherent notability. A basic BEFORE (JSTOR, newspapers.com, Google News, Google Books) fails to find any further RS. It's possible Chinese-language sources exist but my (admittedly rudimentary) attempts to locate them have proved without fruition. I suggest this be deleted for failing the GNG with no prejudice for future recreation if sources could be one day discovered. Chetsford (talk) 18:44, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Hong Kong-listed investment firm Nan Hai (SEHK680) owns Dadi Film Group, which controls Dadi Cinema Group and Dadi Film Distribution. Dadi Cinema Group is another name for Dadi Theater Circuit. There is currently only a Wikipedia article about Dadi Theater Circuit. A consolidated article about Nan Hai or Dadi Film Group may make more sense.

    Cunard (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Maybe notable, but if it remains unreferenced, it will still need to be deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sandstein: The article was fully sourced until this IP edit last year. I've restored the old sourced info, even though it's a bit outdated. -Zanhe (talk) 16:22, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.