The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 01:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dargu Shomali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of Notability QuartzReload (talk) 21:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Populated, legally-recognized places are typically considered notable per Wikipedia:GEOLAND--180.155.69.97 (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, per the comment above. --Soman (talk) 05:49, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, also as above. The article may have little detail and few references, at present, though that is not a justification for deletion. What is in the article is referenced, therefore notable. EP111 (talk) 10:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Officially recognized populated place, which is considered notable per long-standing AfD precedent as part of the gazetteer function of Wikipedia, as established in the five pillars. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 16:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per all the above. Verified town/population center.--Oakshade (talk) 04:45, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.